Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_YX570ZD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_YX570ZD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570ZD
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 12:07
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 36.4
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 125
42% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 386
38% 309 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 11D1) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.3.3
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 7.3
4% 10.9 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxsun 128GB NA6L-2280 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 35 34 35 23 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 401
Write 318
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 41
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.8
32% 7.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 73%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
909GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 96 102 102 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 132
Write 134
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 100
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
232% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.5
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 11.2
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_YX570ZD Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_YX570ZD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback