MSI NF725M-P43 (MS-7597)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7597
MotherboardMSI NF725M-P43 (MS-7597)  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110214
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 02:44
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B93
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 70
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 82.2
42% 64.4 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 157
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
XFX(1682 304A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SS DSA2BW120G3A 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 53 70 92 51 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 150
Write 118
Mixed 104
SusWrite 67.3
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 16.5
61% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.1
DQ Write 48.8
DQ Mixed 20.8
20% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 28h SDRAM
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.4
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NF725M-P43 (MS-7597) Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI NF725M-P43 (MS-7597)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Very poor Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback