Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 19:17
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 604
57% 476 Pts
64-Core 1,350
84% 1,350 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.93
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 188
Parallax 172
131% 174 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 174
Splatting 127
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 750GB-$310
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 304 303 304 306 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 324
Write 300
Mixed 275
SusWrite 302
68% 300 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 34.4
113% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 150
109% 142 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 125%
Kbg40znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
558GB free
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1238 875 662 661 661 661 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,162
Write 1,694
Mixed 1,390
SusWrite 793
285% 1,260 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 51.9
178% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 436
322% 429 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 169%
Great: 226%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 98.2
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 118
Write 108
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 115
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 38.3
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 9.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback