Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 04:46
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 194
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 519
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0521A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,775
Write 1,534
Mixed 1,105
327% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 33.2
184% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 427
DQ Write 635
DQ Mixed 414
346% 492 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 234%
SSD 120GB
56GB free
Firmware: 0200I610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 434 427 397 425 431 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 122
Mixed 328
SusWrite 420
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 32.4
127% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 190
173% 261 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
49GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 128 127 127 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 84.7
Write 88.2
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 126
58% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 103%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
209GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 104
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX424C15FB/8 KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 29.3
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 24.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback