Acer Aspire V3-772G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131011
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 14:43
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 155
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 226
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 6.4
3% 7.6 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
955GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 364 410 380 351 362 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 336
Write 410
Mixed 265
SusWrite 379
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 39.9
134% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 227
203% 309 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
87GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 82 74 60 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 43.2
Write 83
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 70.6
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 9905469-153.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772G Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback