Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 23:16
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 555
58% 466 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
47.5% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 60.1
46% 61.1 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 58.7
Splatting 58.8
50% 61.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zhitai PC005 Active 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZT00D212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 278 278 275 278 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,993
Write 446
Mixed 550
SusWrite 293
178% 821 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 52.8
172% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 421
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 340
304% 453 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 174%
Great: 232%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
586GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 128 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 68.3
Write 108
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 127
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
192% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 21.5
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 15
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback