Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S5300FN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S5300FN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X530FN
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime23.8 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 15:12
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 48
1-Core 24.6
2-Core 62.7
29% 45.1 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 310
30% 244 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1C0E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 6.1
2% 8.03 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$31
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 181 183 67 62 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 1,125
Write 213
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 124
82% 384 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 11.2
68% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 397
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 315
258% 366 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 179%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
589GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 91 93 92 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 48.2
Write 87
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 91.2
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.1
109% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2400HSB-8G 04CB AO1P24HC4R1-BUYS 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 15.7
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S5300FN Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S5300FN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback