Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime13.2 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 14:29
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 174
59% 107 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 312
38% 292 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1278
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 65.9
20% 37.5 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 66.3
46% 55.1 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,541
Write 31.7
Mixed 66.5
252% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 494
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.8
754% 166 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 313%
Nvme CT1000P 1TB
157GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,017
Write 35.5
Mixed 66.9
285% 1,373 MB/s
4K Read 449
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 4.9
688% 152 MB/s
Poor: 128% Great: 299%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 19.8
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $71
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback