Today's hottest deals

Asus M4N68T-M-V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M4N68T-M-V2  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 17:47
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 63.6
44% 61.9 Pts
4-Core 73.3
8-Core 76.6
10% 74.9 Pts
64-Core 87.5
5% 87.5 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
Asus(1043 83A4) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 266.58
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 29 74 48 53 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 46.2
Write 48.8
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 47.9
31% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 69%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
0GB free, PID 0cc7
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 11
Write 7.5
10% 9.25 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N68T-M-V2 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M-V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback