HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z800 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory	41 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '17 at 19:15
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570 2,341 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 66.9 1-Core 81.3 2-Core 163 59% 104 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 645 57% 484 Pts	64-Core 645 40% 645 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Palit(1569 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Lighting 24.4 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 31.1 20% 26.6 fps	MRender 34 Gravity 29 Splatting 25.3 24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141 6,458 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 223GB free Firmware: 0C4005T2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 6 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 4592 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 334 (64) Unknown 100 100 1114304 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 0 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 30 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 0 0 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 16 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 9502 (B3) Unknown 0 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 45 100 313533792301 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 6 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 2 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 6 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3755 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3057 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3086 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 2996	132% Outstanding	Read 1,202 Write 776 Mixed 664 194% 880 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 16.3 99% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 21.1 59% 127 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 159%
OCZ Vector 180 240GB-$160 1,083 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 223GB free Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 133 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 37 (AB) Unknown 100 100 83573584 (AE) Unknown 100 100 10 (BE) vendor-specific 100 100 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 1 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 117 (F2) Unknown 100 100 67 (F9) Unknown 100 100 3951252	65.6% Good	Read 265 Write 255 Mixed 260 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 58.7 4K Mixed 26.8 100% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 83.4 94% 159 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 108%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 502A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 7977635 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -73581379701596 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2658 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 88 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 92 60135571484 (C2) HDA temperature 28 92 60135571484 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7977635 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7977635 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7977635 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13611 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11804 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11804 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13115	57.1% Above average	Read 262 Write 214 Mixed 201 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 18.2 88% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 64.7 77% 134 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 94%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 171 5666 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 83 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 479 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 83 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 612 (C2) HDA temperature 119 118 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	86.4% Excellent	Read 148 Write 153 Mixed 140 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 2.49 4K Mixed 0.26 115% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 96%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 149GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 162 159 4883 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9860 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32541 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5462 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 713 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9860 (C2) HDA temperature 111 99 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 193 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	40.6% Average	Read 71.4 Write 69.7 Mixed 65.6 52% 68.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.32 93% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:... 82GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	60.9% Good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 25.8 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	161x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	88x
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	68x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16