Today's hottest deals

Asus STRIX B250F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX B250F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 14:36
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$49
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 163
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 156
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.8% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 65.7
36% 57.9 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 53.1
Splatting 45.9
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1015A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 116 58 50 51 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 418
Write 339
Mixed 101
SusWrite 85.5
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 10.7
72% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 77.3
DQ Mixed 221
152% 195 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A5143EB1-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.6% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 7.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.6
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX B250F GAMING Builds (Compare 2,688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus STRIX B250F GAMING - $182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $539
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback