Today's hottest deals

IGEL M340C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIGEL M340C  (all builds)
MotherboardIGEL M340C
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 15:13
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-424CC SOC R5E Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 68.5
35% 53.9 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 112
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5E Graphics
AMD(1002 9851) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.9 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256-G2 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 274 340 355 342 267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 436
Write 372
Mixed 390
SusWrite 321
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 30.5
107% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 194
146% 196 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 103%
Intenso Rainbow Line 8GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.2 5.8 4.3 5.8 5.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5.3
8% 7.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-142.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.2% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M340C Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: IGEL M340C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback