Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-AM SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM SE  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 10:35
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 89.7
40% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 90.2
8-Core 90
12% 90.1 Pts
64-Core 88.1
6% 88.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Asus(1043 843F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 1.8
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY26V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 97 79 99 75 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.1% Below average
Read 231
Write 213
Mixed 194
SusWrite 80.2
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 11.2
79% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 13.6
21% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST3160813AS 160GB-$139
140GB free
Firmware: CC2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 97 84 99 77 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 118
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 82.5
64% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM SE Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback