Samsung 930QCA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 930QCA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP930QCA-KA2DE
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 17:35
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 240
73% 139 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 268
43% 309 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Sanyo(144D C194) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 4.1
6% 6.6 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 8.5
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bc711 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41002131 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 517 595 602 573 432 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,032
Write 902
Mixed 664
SusWrite 520
174% 780 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 52.4
150% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 320
226% 291 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 133%
Great: 273%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung U7H704AM-JGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 24.4
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 930QCA Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 930QCA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback