Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LX PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '22 at 04:12
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 362
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B5) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 15.5
13% 20.2 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 16.2
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M256C 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 205 199 202 101 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.4% Average
Read 223
Write 201
Mixed 205
SusWrite 158
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 15.3
83% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 88.1
DQ Mixed 18
25% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
455GB free
Firmware: JP2OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 111 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 97
Write 103
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 110
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX PLUS Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback