Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '22 at 21:21
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 105
53% 81.8 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 205
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Lighting 72.7
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 95.7
59% 77.7 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 48.4
51% 64.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07181
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 85 85 85 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 261
Write 291
Mixed 265
SusWrite 82.5
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 26
93% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 59.8
DQ Mixed 31.6
28% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 93%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47
458GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 175
Write 172
Mixed 95
SusWrite 36.4
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.2
251% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
42GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 85 85 86 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 73.6
Write 73
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 84.3
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$15
28GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 36 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 43.2
Write 43.2
Mixed 34
SusWrite 36.3
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 34%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback