Galaxy A320M Ver1.0

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Galaxy A320M Ver1.0 (all builds)
Motherboard	GALAX GALAX A320M DRAGON GENERAL Ver1.0
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime	10.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '22 at 11:41
Run Duration	342 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160 33,544 User benchmarks, average bench 82% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 65.9 1-Core 132 2-Core 262 82% 153 Pts	4-Core 514 8-Core 702 77% 608 Pts	64-Core 757 47% 757 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 877E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.4% Very good	Lighting 92 Reflection 91.1 Parallax 84.7 75% 89.3 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 79.6 Splatting 72 70% 88.5 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Zotac ZT-SLAA-120C 120GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 65 64 54 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 445 Write 112 Mixed 161 SusWrite 69.9 43% 197 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 16.9 90% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 53.9 DQ Mixed 20.1 35% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 94%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB 9,720 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 129GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 85 84 84 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 76.5 Write 14.4 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 83.6 40% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 642GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 121 125 125 126 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 133 Write 136 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 124 135% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 46% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GBF1X08LFHH35-12-K 2x8GB 3,095 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.3% Good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 25.7 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 21.8 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M Ver1.0 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: Galaxy A320M Ver1.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	21x
Ryzen 5 3500XAMD $160Bench 82%, 33,544 samples	7x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	6x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	9x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
ZT-SLAA-120C 120GBZotacBench 73%, 55 samples	4x
WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GBWDCBench 46%, 14,337 samples	3x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x

RAM
VMA44UG-MIC1U22L1 2x8GBUnknownBench 84%, 50 samples	5x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	3x
HX426C16FB2/8 KHX2666C16/8G 16GBKingstonBench 80%, 86 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $280

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16