MSI GS66 Stealth

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI GS66 Stealth  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-16V1
Memory2.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201119
Uptime18.9 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 15:01
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 112
53% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 356
34% 281 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12AE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.3% Very good
Lighting 86.7
Reflection 91.4
Parallax 103
71% 93.6 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 91.5
Splatting 85.8
82% 102 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 90%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1032 1TB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11111000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1140 604 681 685 671 649 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,678
Write 1,654
Mixed 1,454
SusWrite 738
310% 1,381 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 41.6
126% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 360
256% 329 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 166%
Great: 322%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 22.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16V1 Builds (Compare 1,680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: MSI GS66 Stealth - $1,599

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,599
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback