Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IC
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210902
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 04:51
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 121
55% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 831
66% 582 Pts
64-Core 1028
64% 1028 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 11DC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02.01
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 8.3
5% 24.8 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 9.3
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 649 631 657 662 687 698 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 765
Write 769
Mixed 681
SusWrite 664
162% 720 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 48.2
147% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 476
331% 421 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 135%
Great: 229%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC Builds (Compare 791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback