HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 14-cm0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A2
Memory9.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 18:32
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 57.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 206
67% 124 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 522
53% 429 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84A2) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 12
Parallax 16.8
10% 13.7 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 11
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 88 108 77 127 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 629
Write 231
Mixed 252
SusWrite 110
67% 305 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 27.1
104% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 54.7
DQ Mixed 118
144% 272 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 147%
Mtfddak5 12MBF-1AN1ZA 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: M603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 348 346 353 360 361 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.1% Above average
Read 341
Write 342
Mixed 213
SusWrite 351
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 17.5
59% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 98.5
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 74.4
58% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 20GB
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-cm0xxx Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback