Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 20:45
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 168
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 639
56% 478 Pts
64-Core 1,223
76% 1,223 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D700 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 0127) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.3% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 51.1
29% 35.7 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 21.6
24% 30.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OWC Aura Pro X SSD 480GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C2.3.21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 699 365 355 375 368 380 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 620
Write 387
Mixed 446
SusWrite 424
105% 469 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 33.5
107% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 500
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 423
312% 416 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D33393342324737304442302D434D412020 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 52
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 42
130% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback