MSI H81M-E34 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-E34 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '22 at 18:26
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 205
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 357
49% 362 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 60
52% 62.9 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 58.7
51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
REVOLUTIONS500_512OEM 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0813A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 382 379 438 439 436 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 428
Write 416
Mixed 333
SusWrite 381
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 27.6
123% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 47.1
91% 176 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 18.1
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E34 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 1,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H81M-E34 (MS-7817)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback