Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G5 Desktop Mini

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G5 Desktop Mini  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 859C
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220323
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateSep 24 '22 at 18:07
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 318
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
HP(103C 859C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 6
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 259 220 220 224 225 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,244
Write 884
Mixed 967
SusWrite 240
186% 834 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 40.6
140% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 560
408% 536 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 131%
Great: 190%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.2% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 6.5
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G5 Desktop Mini Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G5 Desktop Mini

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback