Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-da0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A6
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190828
Uptime5 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 11:33
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 47.7
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 124
50% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 204
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 84A6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 6.3
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+224G 240GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 116 133 133 214 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 567
Write 123
Mixed 194
SusWrite 125
55% 252 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 41.1
143% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 240
177% 238 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 6.5
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-da0xxx Builds (Compare 5,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback