Asus H110M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-F  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 17:42
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$48
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 162
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 213
32% 229 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$82
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 39
Parallax 31.2
27% 34.4 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 22.8
24% 31 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ulike 128GB 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 56 149 324 152 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.2% Above average
Read 419
Write 150
Mixed 326
SusWrite 162
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 11.2
82% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 19.1
61% 128 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
749GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 109 148 134 160 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 175
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 140
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C16K2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 8.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-F Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $141
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback