Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-34

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-34  (all builds)
MotherboardGLK Rose_GL
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210624
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 04:14
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Memory 17.5
1-Core 35
2-Core 30.4
17% 27.6 Pts
4-Core 35.8
8-Core 37.1
5% 36.4 Pts
64-Core 38.9
2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Acer(1025 1360) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 1
0% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1014 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 133 101 114 128 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 341
Write 298
Mixed 332
SusWrite 126
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 6.9
28% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 72.6
DQ Write 53
DQ Mixed 59.5
45% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 155%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.13% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 0.6
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 339
12% 339 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.13%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-34 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-34

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback