Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887C
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 09:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 62.6
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 208
62% 116 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 504
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 9
Parallax 16.9
4% 10.5 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 14.5
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.12%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SBP3512K-AH 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 195 390 175 218 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 763
Write 685
Mixed 536
SusWrite 283
127% 567 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 16
81% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 440
306% 393 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 12.2
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14s-fq1xxx Builds (Compare 444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback