Today's hottest deals

AMD A88

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAMD A88  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '22 at 04:13
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Memory 35.4
1-Core 17.2
2-Core 43.3
21% 32 Pts
4-Core 45.2
8-Core 49.4
6% 47.3 Pts
64-Core 49.3
3% 49.3 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Palit(1569 0F00) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM2OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 56 64 65 63 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 49.6
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 63.2
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 50%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
481GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 23 21 22 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 52.1
Write 26.3
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 22.3
37% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
42% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G HX318C10F/8 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.6
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMD A88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback