Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z270 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateOct 12 '22 at 13:23
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 203
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 574
58% 472 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8619) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.4% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 65.6
56% 68.7 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 63.6
54% 66.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 599 589 592 581 567 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,430
Write 1,040
Mixed 824
SusWrite 638
219% 983 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 66.1
208% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 468
DQ Mixed 610
451% 599 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 188%
Great: 429%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
46GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 138 118 93 89 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 425
Write 246
Mixed 302
SusWrite 116
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 37.9
131% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 189
180% 284 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 118%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$90
56GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 289 81 82 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 398
Mixed 400
SusWrite 155
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 45.9
148% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 351
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91%
Great: 128%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
175GB free
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 4.7 38 18 44 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43% Average
Read 420
Write 339
Mixed 202
SusWrite 78
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 11.8
57% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 45.7
50% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
540GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 155 154 156 154 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 87.7
Write 96.7
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 153
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 112%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
87GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 114
Write 35.4
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 33.9
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$68
274GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 80 80 81 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 81
Write 87.7
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 79.3
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 84%
SAMSUNG HD502HJ 500GB
68GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 30 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 32.7
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 31.5
41% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 25.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 27.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 61.1
65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback