Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-da2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-da2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86B4
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '22 at 00:34
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 45.4
32% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 224
20% 169 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
HP(103C 86B4) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2225
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 5.5
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.4
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLH128HBHQ-000H1 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 186 184 182 179 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 318
Write 336
Mixed 308
SusWrite 184
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 29.8
92% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 212
170% 238 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
156GB free
Firmware: RTM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 120 123 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 48.8
Write 110
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 115
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
73% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8ME-8 Crucial CB8GS2666.C8JT 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-da2xxx Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback