HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '17 at 20:32
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 203
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 365
47% 357 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3131
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PN CS1311 120GB SSD
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 512
Write 213
Mixed 110
60% 278 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 7.39
63% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 30.8
54% 107 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 82%
Toshib MQ01ACF050 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: AV00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 108
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.18
86% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 67%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
326GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 39.8
Mixed 34
48% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.28
47% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback