Today's hottest deals

Biostar TB250-BTC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar TB250-BTC  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '22 at 20:54
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$49
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 64
1-Core 55
2-Core 108
46% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 128
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.10.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.2% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 89.7
54% 72.6 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 75.6
Splatting 46
49% 62.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SNVS100 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8442105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 758 893 942 1320 1446 1292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 992
Write 1,145
Mixed 790
SusWrite 1,109
228% 1,009 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 17.6
99% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 281
210% 281 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 149%
Great: 242%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-4GNT 04CB 8GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TB250-BTC Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Biostar TB250-BTC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback