Asus CM1740

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CM1740  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM1740
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120207
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 31 '22 at 13:22
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3820 APU
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 54
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 58.8
32% 48.5 Pts
4-Core 85.5
8-Core 131
13% 108 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V5800 (FireGL) Graphics Adapter
HP(103C 2306) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
7.71% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 9.2
8% 9.83 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 6.8
6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.71%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 12 11 6.8 9.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Read 15.1
Write 22.9
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 10.1
12% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
35% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
442GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 90 95 93 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 55
SusWrite 91.8
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 10
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM1740 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM1740

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback