PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Q87M-E (all builds) |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190322 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 01 '22 at 16:45 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
47.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 131 227 215 235 229 MB/s
|
61.7%
Good
|
|||
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 51 58 56 59 58 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
210GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 68 77 74 67 64 MB/s
|
44.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 229x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 186x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 110x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 136x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 104x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 82x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $380 |