Monster TULPAR T5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5  (all builds)
MotherboardMonster TULPAR T5
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 17:29
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 160
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 423
44% 351 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
MSI(1462 112D) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Below average
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 37.5
30% 38.8 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 34.5
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 112D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.4
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 70 61 39 54 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 456
Write 125
Mixed 150
SusWrite 61.6
43% 198 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 21.2
95% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 58
85% 164 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 74%
Gragos MSATA 256GB
208GB free
Firmware: 2012XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 368 374 376 374 378 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.2% Excellent
Read 444
Write 370
Mixed 357
SusWrite 374
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 24.5
103% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 47.1
90% 176 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 82%
Gragos MSATA 256GB
133GB free
Firmware: 2012XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 363 371 370 371 377 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.1% Excellent
Read 463
Write 360
Mixed 363
SusWrite 371
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 24.3
95% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 45.4
97% 196 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 82%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
61GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 71 71 67 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 53.7
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 70.7
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.2
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $44
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback