Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 07:09
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 176
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 323
40% 306 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 400
HP(103C 0893) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.6 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD My Passport 264F 1TB
566GB free
Firmware: 2005
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 42.2
Write 39.7
Mixed 39.5
9% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 9.2
35% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 21.9
DQ Mixed 23.9
17% 22.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
546GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 165
Write 152
Mixed 63.8
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
33GB free
Firmware: HP73
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 65.3
Write 62.2
Mixed 36.7
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 8000 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback