Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 850 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83B2
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220915
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 13 '22 at 14:33
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Memory 35.4
1-Core 17.9
2-Core 33.3
20% 28.9 Pts
4-Core 49.5
8-Core 68.8
7% 59.2 Pts
64-Core 79.5
5% 79.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 83B2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 2.6
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0T14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 156 216 220 271 205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 259
Write 287
Mixed 276
SusWrite 218
59% 260 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 9
34% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 124
96% 133 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 40%
Great: 91%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
4GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 13 12 12 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 13.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 850 G5 Builds (Compare 1,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback