Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1240P 2,059 User benchmarks, average bench 83% U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.7 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Memory 35.5 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 96.7 41% 71 Pts	4-Core 97.6 8-Core 152 15% 125 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 72,765 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Legend(17AA 22E8) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 7.4 Parallax 7.9 4% 6.8 fps	MRender 9.7 Gravity 11.2 Splatting 8.7 8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKBA256TFK 256GB 216 User benchmarks, average bench 163% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0002V5LN SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 480 436 425 356 369 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 641 Write 404 Mixed 494 SusWrite 406 109% 486 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 23.1 79% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 56.7 DQ Mixed 82.2 62% 86 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 251%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2G44BM0-CWE M471A2G43BB2-CWE 32GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 20.9 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 11.2 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 224 18% 224 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i5-1240PIntelBench 83%, 2,059 samples	1x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	1x

SSD
MTFDKBA256TFK 256GBMicronBench 163%, 216 samples	1x

RAM
M471A2G44BM0-CWE M471A2G43BB2-CWE 32GBSamsungBench 89%, 187 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16