Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 20:40
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 31.8
2-Core 38.6
30% 42.3 Pts
4-Core 70
8-Core 66.5
9% 68.2 Pts
64-Core 75
5% 75 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.8% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 31.2
25% 27.7 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 23.1
22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3E00100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 130 37 87 63 29 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.6% Poor
Read 98.8
Write 136
Mixed 140
SusWrite 73.9
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 4.3
24% 7.47 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 102
80% 112 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-052.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.1% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback