Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte G1.Sniper B5
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '22 at 02:08
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 170 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 277 36% 270 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 373A) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 526.98 Performing below potential (88^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)	54% Above average	Lighting 66.7 Reflection 67.1 Parallax 62.1 54% 65.3 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 67.9 Splatting 61.6 53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB 13,649 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RA SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 80 124 65 114 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 420 Write 358 Mixed 326 SusWrite 112 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 31.1 104% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 32.2 64% 133 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 89%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 54GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 331 352 347 363 341 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 212 Write 365 Mixed 236 SusWrite 341 66% 288 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 22.1 78% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 96 DQ Mixed 137 99% 130 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 526GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 139 137 140 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 118 Write 93.2 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 138 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0622 DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 17.9 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 18.7 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 35%

Jet ski

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	99x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	64x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	38x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	37x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	25x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	30x
18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 32GBMicronBench 58%, 25 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	20x

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $648

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16