Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '17 at 00:22
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 65
2-Core 124
55% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 260
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368E) 2GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 40.7
39% 44.6 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 37
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 370
Write 202
Mixed 236
59% 269 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 2.38
68% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 3.26
20% 43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 78%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0911
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 26.2
Mixed 25
20% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.14
4K Write 3.22
4K Mixed 0.51
164% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST3400820AS 400GB
285GB free
Firmware: 3.CHL Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 72.3
Write 70.7
Mixed 26.3
41% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.37
91% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R538G1609U1K 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback