Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF114-34

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF114-34  (all builds)
MotherboardJSL Labatt_JL
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 11:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
21% Poor
Memory 26.7
1-Core 21.1
2-Core 34.2
18% 27.3 Pts
4-Core 87.7
8-Core 93.4
12% 90.6 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1516) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1014 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 239 184 187 196 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 1,099
Write 732
Mixed 771
SusWrite 203
156% 701 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 21.7
68% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 210
141% 170 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.5% Poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 275
15% 275 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF114-34 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF114-34

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback