HP Pro Tower 400 G9 PCI Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro Tower 400 G9 PCI Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8953
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 14:37
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500-$196
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 172
2-Core 356
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 968
96% 785 Pts
64-Core 1,233
76% 1,233 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
HP(103C 8953) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1002
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 10.4
7% 10.9 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 1
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D512-HP 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L482
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1373 1505 1503 1587 1488 472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,993
Write 1,720
Mixed 1,347
SusWrite 1,321
358% 1,595 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 36.7
170% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,106
DQ Write 1,313
DQ Mixed 758
697% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 265%
Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U2S8MF-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro Tower 400 G9 PCI Desktop PC Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Pro Tower 400 G9 PCI Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $373WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback