ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 2758MRG

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 2758MRG (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2758MRG
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121129
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '17 at 17:08
Run Duration	100 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X9100-$150 548 User benchmarks, average bench 41% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 69.1 1-Core 18.4 2-Core 57.7 34% 48.4 Pts	4-Core 57.3 8-Core 61.6 8% 59.4 Pts	64-Core 80.2 5% 80.2 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M 383 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 2118) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	6.22% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 7.62 Parallax 3.28 7% 6.47 fps	MRender 6.62 Gravity 6.33 Splatting 5.13 5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.22% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OS 240GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 368 Write 170 Mixed 175 52% 238 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 12.7 60% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 81 DQ Write 70.3 DQ Mixed 33.7 37% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.63 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback