Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 20:22
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 845
87% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,047
65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 51.3
45% 54.5 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 45
42% 52.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GN-SSD-SH/240GB 240GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 437 441 452 453 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 456
Mixed 442
SusWrite 440
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 32.9
146% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 58.8
108% 210 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.1127CS.006 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 27.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback