Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP470EA_TP470EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP470EA_TP470EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP470EA
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 19:44
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 50.8
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 124
48% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 271
36% 267 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 13D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 14
Parallax 10.8
8% 11.4 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 11.6
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 173 172 185 206 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 680
Write 674
Mixed 522
SusWrite 196
116% 518 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 30.7
98% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 404
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 326
237% 312 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.6% Very good
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 21.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 9.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP470EA_TP470EA Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP470EA_TP470EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback