Today's hottest deals

HP 500-054

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-054  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130321
Uptime31.6 Days
Run DateDec 10 '22 at 16:22
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 53
2-Core 95.4
49% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 139
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
HP(103C 2AE0) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.1% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 4.8
4% 5.73 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 4
Splatting 7.2
5% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.1%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 222 213 216 219 216 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 282
Write 333
Mixed 196
SusWrite 217
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 36.6
122% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 191
155% 220 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-054 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-054

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback