Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL QX60_TLS
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '22 at 15:32
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 56
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 148
52% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 451
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 742
46% 742 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
7.93% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 11.4
8% 12.5 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 13.1
8% 8.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1547) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 130
Parallax 120
103% 126 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 99.9
Splatting 90.1
89% 112 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00BT7 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7302Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1023 1030 983 998 874 881 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2,006
Write 1,905
Mixed 921
SusWrite 965
324% 1,449 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 59.5
168% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 488
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 422
318% 429 MB/s
Poor: 193%
This bench: 212%
Great: 388%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD4S320038G22-B 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 28.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 10.7
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-54 Builds (Compare 3,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback