Today's hottest deals

MSI H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star H310 Gaming Infinite (MS-B915)
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180531
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '22 at 18:28
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$145
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 84.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 255
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 800
78% 641 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.6% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 126
Parallax 115
94% 119 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 122
Splatting 106
88% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 180 84 75 79 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 448
Mixed 353
SusWrite 120
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 47.6
158% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 124%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 204 194 194 202 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 206
Write 189
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 199
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 1.4
50% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 5.2
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 1.2
3% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 44%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
698GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 636 656 735 768 755 755 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 957
Write 1,038
Mixed 1,012
SusWrite 717
210% 931 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 61.6
206% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 1,405
DQ Write 1203
DQ Mixed 1,277
964% 1,295 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 204%
Great: 365%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 161 163 163 168 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 93.4
Write 85
Mixed 95
SusWrite 163
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
292% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 93%
Seagate Expansion SW 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 31.6
Write 37.7
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 39.1
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion+ 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 115 114 110 111 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 122
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 112
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
172% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28) Builds (Compare 1,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback