Today's hottest deals

Asus G11CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G11CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G11CD
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 12 '22 at 22:09
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 161
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 246
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 8664) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.9% Average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 58.7
44% 58.9 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 51.2
47% 58.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD18 0EDGZ-11B2DA0 18TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 56 57 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 139
Write 123
Mixed 120
SusWrite 57.5
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 1.2
12% 4.5 MB/s
DQ Read 9.4
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 2.7
4% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 25%
WDC WD18 0EDGZ-11B2DA0 18TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 58 55 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 162
Write 147
Mixed 128
SusWrite 57.8
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 3
14% 5.07 MB/s
DQ Read 7.6
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 6
5% 7.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 25%
WDC WD18 1KRYZ-01AGBB0 18TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 59 56 58 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 162
Write 158
Mixed 118
SusWrite 57.8
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 0.3
13% 5.07 MB/s
DQ Read 2
DQ Write 7.1
DQ Mixed 5.6
4% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 37%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 140 147 136 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 180
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 142
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.7
349% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 138%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$137
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 55 53 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 120
Write 133
Mixed 38
SusWrite 55.8
63% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.7
227% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 58 57 58 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 121%
Seagate ST14000VX0008-2JP101 14TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 58 56 58 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD WD10 1PURZ-85C62Y0 10TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 58 57 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 197
Write 206
Mixed 121
SusWrite 59
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.7
377% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD832A.M16FJ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G11CD Builds (Compare 2,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Asus G11CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback